AutoGPT vs deepseek-harness
Real adoption data from 280 days of tracking. Updated 2026-08-18.
Quick Take
deepseek-harness is growing faster (+51.1% vs +0.1%)
Based on 280 days of tracking, deepseek-harness shows stronger momentum with 51.1% weekly growth.
📊 Head to Head
Total Stars
Growth Rate
Stars Gained
📈 Star Growth Over Time
Based on 280 days of RepoPi snapshots
● AutoGPT
● deepseek-harness
🔍 At a Glance
AutoGPT
deepseek-harness
Language
Python
TypeScript
Stars
186.7k
154.5k
Growth (280d)
+3.9%
+51.1%
Primary Topics
agentic-ai, agents, ai
ai-agents, cordis, dsh
Choose AutoGPT when...
- You work primarily in the Python ecosystem
- You need agentic-ai, agents capabilities
- You value a large, active community (186.7k+ stars)
- You prefer a project with proven momentum (+3.9% tracked growth)
Choose deepseek-harness when...
- You work primarily in the TypeScript ecosystem
- You need ai-agents, cordis capabilities
- You value a large, active community (154.5k+ stars)
- You prefer a project with proven momentum (+51.1% tracked growth)