deepseek-harness vs AutoGPT

Real adoption data from 286 days of tracking. Updated 2026-08-24.

Quick Take

deepseek-harness is growing faster (+34.7% vs +0.1%)

Based on 286 days of tracking, deepseek-harness shows stronger momentum with 34.7% weekly growth.

📊 Head to Head

Total Stars
⭐ 189.5k
⭐ 186.8k
Growth Rate
↑34.7%
↑0.1%
Stars Gained
+87.3k
+7.2k

📈 Star Growth Over Time

Based on 286 days of RepoPi snapshots

● deepseek-harness ● AutoGPT

🔍 At a Glance

deepseek-harness
AutoGPT
Language
TypeScript
Python
Stars
189.5k
186.8k
Growth (286d)
+85.5%
+4.0%
Primary Topics
ai-agents, cordis, dsh
agentic-ai, agents, ai

Choose deepseek-harness when...

  • You work primarily in the TypeScript ecosystem
  • You need ai-agents, cordis capabilities
  • You value a large, active community (189.5k+ stars)
  • You prefer a project with proven momentum (+85.5% tracked growth)
Full deepseek-harness analysis →

Choose AutoGPT when...

  • You work primarily in the Python ecosystem
  • You need agentic-ai, agents capabilities
  • You value a large, active community (186.8k+ stars)
  • You prefer a project with proven momentum (+4.0% tracked growth)
Full AutoGPT analysis →