ECC vs deepseek-harness

Real adoption data from 280 days of tracking. Updated 2026-08-18.

Quick Take

deepseek-harness is growing faster (+51.1% vs +0.6%)

Based on 280 days of tracking, deepseek-harness shows stronger momentum with 51.1% weekly growth.

📊 Head to Head

Total Stars
⭐ 240.8k
⭐ 154.5k
Growth Rate
↑0.6%
↑51.1%
Stars Gained
+53.9k
+52.3k

📈 Star Growth Over Time

Based on 280 days of RepoPi snapshots

● ECC ● deepseek-harness

🔍 At a Glance

ECC
deepseek-harness
Language
JavaScript
TypeScript
Stars
240.8k
154.5k
Growth (280d)
+28.8%
+51.1%
Primary Topics
ai-agents, anthropic, claude
ai-agents, cordis, dsh

Choose ECC when...

  • You work primarily in the JavaScript ecosystem
  • You need ai-agents, anthropic capabilities
  • You value a large, active community (240.8k+ stars)
  • You prefer a project with proven momentum (+28.8% tracked growth)
Full ECC analysis →

Choose deepseek-harness when...

  • You work primarily in the TypeScript ecosystem
  • You need ai-agents, cordis capabilities
  • You value a large, active community (154.5k+ stars)
  • You prefer a project with proven momentum (+51.1% tracked growth)
Full deepseek-harness analysis →