deepseek-harness vs firecrawl

Real adoption data from 282 days of tracking. Updated 2026-08-20.

Quick Take

deepseek-harness is growing faster (+66.1% vs +1.9%)

Based on 282 days of tracking, deepseek-harness shows stronger momentum with 66.1% weekly growth.

📊 Head to Head

Total Stars
⭐ 169.8k
⭐ 169.8k
Growth Rate
↑66.1%
↑1.9%
Stars Gained
+67.6k
+102.5k

📈 Star Growth Over Time

Based on 282 days of RepoPi snapshots

● deepseek-harness ● firecrawl

🔍 At a Glance

deepseek-harness
firecrawl
Language
TypeScript
TypeScript
Stars
169.8k
169.8k
Growth (282d)
+66.1%
+152.4%
Primary Topics
ai-agents, cordis, dsh
ai, ai-agents, ai-crawler

Choose deepseek-harness when...

  • You work primarily in the TypeScript ecosystem
  • You need ai-agents, cordis capabilities
  • You value a large, active community (169.8k+ stars)
  • You prefer a project with proven momentum (+66.1% tracked growth)
Full deepseek-harness analysis →

Choose firecrawl when...

  • You work primarily in the TypeScript ecosystem
  • You need ai, ai-agents capabilities
  • You value a large, active community (169.8k+ stars)
  • You prefer a project with proven momentum (+152.4% tracked growth)
Full firecrawl analysis →